OBSERVATION OF
COLD NUCLEAR FUSION IN CONDENSED MATTER
S. E. Jones, E. P. Palmer, J. B. Czirr, D. L. Decker, G. L. Jensen,
J. M. Thorne, and S. F. Taylor
Department of Physics and Chemistry
Brigham Young University
Provo, Utah 84602
and
J. Rafelski
Department of Physics
University of Arizona
Tucson, Arizona 85721
March 23, 1989
Fusion of isotopic hydrogen nuclei is the principal means of producing
energy in the high-temperature interior of stars. In relatively cold
terrestrial conditions, the nuclei are clothed with electrons and
approach one another no closer than allowed by the molecular Coulomb
barrier. The rate of nuclear fusion in molecular hydrogen is then
governed by the quantum-mechanical tunneling through that barrier, or
equivalently, the probability of finding the two nuclei at zero
separation. In a deuterium molecule, where the equilibrium separation
between deuterons (d) is 0.74 A, the d-d fusion rate is exceedingly
slow, about 10E-70 per D molecule per second. [1]
2
By replacing the electron in a hydrogen molecular ion with a more
massive charged particle, the fusion rate is greatly increased. In
muon-catalyzed fusion, the internuclear separation is reduced by a
factor of approximately 200 (the muon to electron mass ratio), and the
nuclear fusion rate correspondingly increases by roughly eighty orders
of magnitude [1]. Muon-catalyzed fusion has been demonstrated to be
an effective means of rapidly inducing fusion reactions in low-
temperature hydrogen isotopic mixtures [2].
A hypothetical quasi-particle a few times as massive as the electron
would increase the cold fusion rate to readily measurable levels,
about 10E-20 fusions per d-d molecule per second [1]. Our results
imply that an equivalent distortion on the internuclear hydrogen
wavefunction can be realized under certain conditions when hydrogen
isotopic nuclei are loaded into metallic crystalline lattices and
other forms of condensed matter.
We have discovered a means of inducing nuclear fusion without the use
of either high temperatures or radioactive muons. We will present
direct experimental results as well as indirect geological evidence
for the occurrence of cold nuclear fusion.
DETECTION OF COLD FUSION NEUTRONS
We have observed deuteron-deuteron fusion at room temperature during
low-voltage electrolytic infusion of deuterons into metallic titanium
or palladium electrodes. The fusion reaction
3
d + d -> He (0.82 MeV) + n (2.45 MeV) (1a)
+
is evidently catalyzed as d and metal ions from the electrolyte are
deposited at (and into) the negative electrode. Neutrons having
approximately 2.5 MeV energy are clearly detected with a sensitive
neutron spectrometer. The experimental layout is portrayed in Figure
1. We have not yet obtained results regarding the parallel reaction
d + d -> p (3.02 MeV) + t (1.01 MeV) (1b)
as this requires different measuring procedures. However, it can be
presumed that the reaction (1b) occurs at a nearly equal rate as the
reaction (1a), which is usually the case.
The neutron spectrometer, developed at Brigham Young University over
the past few years [3], has been crucial to the identification of this
cold fusion process. The detector consists of a liquid organic
scintillator (BC-505) contained in a glass cylinder 12.5 cm in
diameter, in which three lithium-6-doped glass scintillator plates are
embedded. Neutrons deposit energy in the liquid scintillator via
collisions and the resulting light output yields energy information.
These, now low-energy neutrons are then scavenged by lithium-6 nuclei
6 4
in the glass plates where the reaction n + Li –> t + He results in
scintillations in the glass. Pulse shapes from the two media differ
so that distinct signals are registered by the two photomultiplier
tubes (whose signals are summed). A coincidence of signals from the
two media with 20 microseconds identifies the neutrons.
An energy calibration of the spectrometer was obtained using 2.9 and
3.2 MeV neutrons, generated via deuteron-deuteron interactions at 90
degrees and 0 degrees, respectively, with respect to the deuteron beam
from a Van de Graaf accelerator. The observed energy spectra show a
broad structure which implies that 2.45 MeV neutrons should appear in
the multi-channel analyzer spectrum in channels 45-150. Stability of
the detector system was checked between data runs by measuring the
counting rate for fission neutrons from a broad-spectrum californium-
252 source. We have performed other extensive tests proving that our
neutron counter does not respond in this pulse height range to other
sources of radiation such as thermal neutrons.
Background rates in the neutron counter are approximately 10E-3 1/s in
the energy region where 2.5 MeV neutrons are anticipated. By
comparing energy spectra from gamma and neutron sources we have
determined that nearly all of the background stems from accidental
coincidences of gamma-ray events. Improvements in the shielding and
gamma-ray rejection were pursued throughout the experiments, resulting
in significant reduction in background levels.
During the search for suitable catalytic materials, we developed the
following (unoptimized) prescription for the electrolytic cells. The
electrolyte is a mixture of 160 g deuterium oxide (D O) plus various
2
metal salts in 0.2 g amounts each: FeSO . 7H O, NiCl . 6H O,
4 2 2 2
PdCl , CaCO , Li SO . H O, NaSO . 10H O, CaH (PO ) . H O,
2 3 2 4 2 4 2 4 4 2 2
TiOSO . H SO . 8H O, and a very small amount of AuCN.
4 2 4 2
(Our evidence indicates the importance of co-deposition of deuterons
and metal ions at the negative electrode.) The pH is adjusted to
pH He + gamma (5.4 MeV) (4)
Deuterium was incorporated in the earth during its formation. The
current abundance in sea water is about 1.5x10E-4 deuterons per
proton. Water is carried down into the earth’s upper mantle at
converging plate margins, and seawater is transported as deep as the
Moho at spreading regions [7]. Estimates of water subduction suggest
that a water mass equal to the ocean mass is cycled through the mantle
in about 1-billion years [7]. Thus, 1.4x10E43 deuterons are cycled
through the mantle in 3x10E16 s. Since each p-d fusion releases 5.4
MeV (8.6×10-13 J), we calculate that a heat flux of 750 mW/(m*m),
averaged over the earth, would result if all deuterium fused at the
rate at which it is supplied by subduction. This is more than ten
times the estimate of the actual flux of 60 mW/(m*m) [8]. Thus,
geological p-d fusion could possibly contribute to the observed heat
flux, the high temperatures of the earth’s core and provide an energy
source for plate tectonics.
The foregoing data allow a geological fusion rate lambda to be
f
calculated. We assume a first-order rate equation for p-d
fusion: dN = lambda N dt, or lambda = (dN/N)dt. The fraction (dN/N)
f f
is the ratio of the number of fusions which take place to the number
of atoms available. It is also the rate of fusion divided by the rate
of supply of deuterons; thus, dN/N is equal to the actual heat flux
from the earth divided by the possible heat flux so that
-1
lambda = (60/750)/3x10E16 s = 3x10E-18 s (5)
f
Consider next the possibility that the localized heat of volcanism at
subduction zones is supplied by fusion. As much as 10E6 J/kg is
required to turn rock into magma, and this must be supplied from a
local source of energy. Subducting rock contains about 3 percent
water [7], or 3x10E30 deuterons/kg. If the time available for melting
is equal to the time required for a plate to travel down a slant
distance of 700 km at a speed of 2.5 cm/year, about 10E15 s, the
inferred fusion rate is:
lambda = (10E6 J/kg)/(3x10E20 d/kg x 8.6E10-13 J/fusion x 10E15 s)
f
lambda = 4x10E-18 fusions/d/s (6)
f
This requires only about 0.3 percent of the available nuclear fuel.
The limit on the available heat is therefore the fusion rate constant,
rather than the scarcity of fuel.
While some of the earth’s heat must certainly derive from several
sources, “cold” geological nuclear fusion could account for steady-
3
state production of considerable heat and He in the earth’s interior.
3 4
High values of the He/ He ratio are found in the rocks, liquids, and
gases from volcanoes and other active tectonic regions [9].
3
Primordial He will be present from the formation of the earth [9],
but some may be generated by terrestrial nuclear fusion. The
discovery of cold nuclear fusion in the laboratory, with a rate
constant comparable to that derived from geologic thermal data,
supports our hypothesis.
Based on this new concept, we predict that some tritium should be
produced by d-d fusion in the earth (see equation 1). Since tritium
3
decays according to t -> He + beta with a 12-year half-life,
detection of tritium in volcanic emissions would imply cold-fusion
production of tritium. This is supported by the following
observations. A tritium monitoring station was operated at Mauna Loa
on Hawaii Island from August 1971 to the end of 1977. We have found
strong correlations between tritium detected at Mauna Loa and nearby
volcanic activity in this period of time. Figure 4 displays data
compiled by Ostlund for HT gas measured at the Mauna Loa station in
1972 [10]. Similar data taken at Miami, Florida, are provided for
comparison. A striking spike in the tritium level is clearly seen in
the February-March 1972 Mauna Loa data. Ostlund notes that these
significant tritium readings over a several-week period have not been
previously understood; in particular, the timing and shape of the peak
is inconsistent with hydrogen bomb tests in Russia five months earlier
[10]. However, this signal is coincident with a major eruption of the
Mauna Ulu volcano [11] 40 km to the southeast. Furthermore, winds in
March 1972 carried volcanic gases northwest, towards the Mauna Loa
station and on towards Honolulu 200 km away: “Trade winds [from the
northeast] were infrequent and the southerly flow that replaced them
occasionally blanketed the state with volcanic haze from an eruption
on Hawaii Island … High particulate matter measurements in Honolulu
confirmed the northward spread of haze from the Mauna Ulu Volcano
eruption on Hawaii Island.” [12]
This remarkable set of circumstances permits us to estimate the amount
of tritium released during the February-March 1972 eruption of Mauna
Ulu. Based on the distance to the Mauna Loa station and average 8 mph
winds [12], we estimate that on average 100 curies of tritium were
released per day for 30 days. An accidental release of this magnitude
of manmade tritium sustained for several weeks on a nearly
uninhabited island is highly unlikely. We conclude that this volcanic
eruption freed tritium produced by geological nuclear reactions.
Other HT data from the Mauna Loa station, such as the high reading in
the latter half of 1972, are also coincident with volcanic activity,
although a tritium-releasing bomb test also occurred in Russia in late
August. A major spike in the atmospheric HT observed near Hawaii in
Dec 1974 – June 1975 [10] coincides with another large volcanic
eruption on Hawaii Island, but the significance is again obscured by
H-bomb tests. Finally, no significant deviations in HT reading are
noted in 1976 or 1977 [10] when no volcanic activity is noted, except
for “gentle” activity at Kileau on September 17, 1977 [13].
OTHER EVIDENCES FOR COLD FUSION
Further evidence for cold nuclear fusion in condensed matter comes
3 4
from studies of He and He in diamonds and metals. Using laser-
slicing of diamonds, H. Craig (private communication) has measured the
4 3 4
absolute concentrations of both He and He. He was found to be
smoothly distributed through the crystal as if it were derived from
3
the environment. On the other hand, He was found to be concentrated
in spots implying in-situ formation. Cold piezonuclear p-d or d-d
fusion provides a plausible explanation for these data.
3
Concentration anomalies of He have also been reported in metal foils
3
[14]. The spotty concentrations of He suggest cold piezonuclear
3
fusion as the origin of the observed He. Note that electrolytic
refining of the metals in deuterium-bearing water could have provided
conditions for cold nuclear fusion. Among several possible
explanations, the authors [14] suggest an “analog” of muon catalysis.
We think they were close to the mark!
Cold nuclear fusion may be important in other celestial bodies besides
earth. Jupiter, for example, radiates about twice as much heat as it
receives from the sun [1]. It is interesting to consider whether cold
nuclear fusion in the core of Jupiter, which is probably metallic
hydrogen plus iron silicate, could account for its excess heat. Heat
is radiated at an approximate rate of 10E18 W, which could be produced
by p-d fusions occurring at a rate of 10E20(1/s) [1]. Assuming a
predominately hydrogen core of radius 4.6x10E9 cm, having a density
= 10 g/(cm*cm*cm) and a deuteron/proton ratio of roughly 10E-4, we
deduce a required p-d fusion rate of lambda = 10E-19
f
fusions/deuteron/second–in remarkable agreement with cold fusion
rates found in terrestrial conditions.
CONCLUSIONS
A new form of cold nuclear fusion has been observed during
electrolytic infusion of deuterons into metals. While the need for
off-equilibrium conditions is clearly implied by our data, techniques
other than electrochemical may also be successful. We have begun to
explore the use of ion implantation, and of elevated pressures and
temperatures mimicking geological conditions.
If deuteron-deuteron fusion can be catalyzed, then the d-t fusion
reaction is probably favored due to its much larger nuclear cross
section. Thus, while the fusion rates observed so far are small,
the discovery of cold nuclear fusion in condensed matter opens the
possibility at least of a new path to fusion energy.
We acknowledge valuable contributions of Douglas Bennion, David Mince,
Lawrence Rees, Howard Vanfleet and J. C. Wang of Brigham Young
University, and of Mike Danos, Fraser Goff, Berndt Muller, Albert
Nier, Gote Ostlund, and Clinton Van Siclen. We especially thank Alan
Anderson for advice on the data analysis and Harmon Craig for
continuing encouragement and for use of his data on diamonds before
their publication.
The research is supported by the Advanced Energy Projects Division of
the U.S. Department of Energy.
REFERENCES
1. Van Siclen, C. D. & Jones, S. E. “Journal of Physics G. Nucl.
Phys.” 12, 213-221 (1986).
2. Jones, S. E. “Nature” 321, 127-133 (1986); Rafelski, J. & Jones,
S. E. “Scientific American” 257, 84-89 (July 1987).
3. Jensen, G. L., Dixon, D. R., Bruening, K. & Czirr, J. B. “Nucl.
Inst. and Methods” 200, 406 (1984); and paper in preparation.
4. MCNP: Monte Carlo Neutron and Photon Transport Code, CCC-200.
Available from Radiation Shielding Information Center, Oak Ridge
National Laboratory (Version 3).
5. Bowman, R. C. Jr. in “Metal Hydrides” (ed. G. Bambakides) 109-144
(New York, Plenum, 1981).
6. Jones, S. E., et al. “Physical Review Letters” 51, 1757-1760
(1983).
7. Fyfe, W. S., Price, N. J., & Thompson, A. B. “Fluids in the
Earth’s Crust” (Elsevier, New York, 1978).
8. Chapman, D. S. & Pollack, H. N. “Earth and Planet Sci. Lett” 28,
23 (1975)
9. Craig, H., Lupton, J. E., Welhan, J. A., & Proveda, R. “Geophys.
Res. Lett.” 5, 897 (1978); Lupton, J. E., & Craig, H. “Science”
214, 13 (1981); Mamyrin, B. A. & Tolstikhin, L. N., “Helium
Isotopes in Nature (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1984).
10. Ostlund, H. G. & Mason, A. S. Atmospheric Tritium 1968-1984,
Tritium Laboratory Report No. 14, University of Miami, Miami,
Florida; Ostlund, H. G., private communication.
11. Bullard, F. M. “Volcanoes of the Earth”, 2nd ed., (Univ. Texas
Press, Austin, 1984).
12. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, “Climatological Data, Hawaii” 68, 29
(1972).
13. Smithsonian Institution, “Volcanoes of the World”, (Stroudsburg,
P. A., Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., 1981).
14. Mamyrin, B. A., Khabarin L. V. & Yudenich, V. S. “Sov. Phys.
Dokl.” 23, 581 (1978).
