INTERVIEW
\n with
\n WILLIAM S. BURROUGHS
\n conducted by
\n Gregory Corso
\n and
\n Allen Ginsberg
\n Originally appeared in Journal For the Protection of All People
\n 1961
\n Transcribed by Flesh
\n 1992
\nB= William Burroughs
\nC= Gregory Corso
\nG= Allen Ginsberg <\/p>\n
C: What is your department? <\/p>\n
B: Kunst unt Wissenschaft <\/p>\n
C: What say you about political conflicts? <\/p>\n
B: Political conflicts are merely surfaced manifestations. If
\n conflicts arise you may certain powers intend to keep this
\n conflict under operation since they hope to profit from the
\n situation. To concern yourself with surface political conflicts
\n is to make the mistake of the bull in the ring, you are
\n charging the cloth. That is what politics is for, to teach you
\n the cloth. Just as the bullfighter teaches the bull, teaches him
\n to follow, obey the cloth. <\/p>\n
C: Who manipulates the cloth? <\/p>\n
B: Death <\/p>\n
G: What is death? <\/p>\n
B: A gimmick. It’s the time birth death gimmick. Can’t go on much
\n longer, too many people are wising up. <\/p>\n
C: Do you feel there has been a definite change in man’s makeup?
\n A new consciousness? <\/p>\n
B: Yes, I can give you a precise answer to that. I feel that the
\n change the mutation in consciousness will occur spontaneously
\n once certain pressures now in operation are removed. I feel that
\n the principal instrument of monopoly and control that prevents
\n expansion of consciousness is the word lines controlling thought
\n feeling and apparent sensory impressions of the human host. <\/p>\n
G: And if removed, what step? <\/p>\n
B: The forward step must be made in silence. we detach ourselves
\n from word forms-this can be accomplished by substituting for
\n words, letters, concepts, verbal concepts, other modes of
\n expression; for example, color. We can translate word and
\n letter into color (Rimbaud stated that in his color vowels,
\n words quote “words” can be read in silent color.) In other
\n words man must get away from verbal forms to attain the
\n consciousness, that which is there to be perceived at hand. <\/p>\n
C: How does one take that “forward step,” can you say? <\/p>\n
B: Well, this is my subject and is what I am concerned with.
\n Forward steps are made by giving up old armor because words are
\n built into you—in the soft typewriter of the womb you do not
\n realize the word-armor you carry; for example, when you read
\n this page your eyes move irresistibly from left to right
\n following the words that you have been accustomed to. Now try
\n breaking up part of the page like this:
\n Are there or just we can translate
\n many solutions for example color word color
\n in the soft typewriter into
\n political conflicts to attain consciousness
\n monopoly and control <\/p>\n
C: Reading that it seems you end up where you began, with politics
\n and it’s nomenclature: conflict, attain, solution, monopoly,
\n control–so what kind of help is that? <\/p>\n
B: Precisely what I was saying—if you talk you always end up with
\n politics, it gets nowhere, I mean man it’s strictly from the
\n soft typewriter. <\/p>\n
C: What kind of advice you got for politicians? <\/p>\n
B: Tell the truth once and for all and shut up forever. <\/p>\n
C: What if people don’t want to change, don’t want no new
\n consciousness? <\/p>\n
B: For any species to change, if they are unable and are unwilling
\n to do so–I might for example however have suggested to the
\n dinosaurs that heavy armor and great size was a sinking ship,
\n and that they do well to convert to mammal facilities—it would
\n not lie in my power or desire to reconvert a reluctant
\n dinosaur. I can make my feeling very clear, Gregory, I fell like
\n I’m on a sinking ship and I want off. <\/p>\n
C: Do you think Hemingway got off? <\/p>\n
B: Probably not. <\/p>\n
(Next day) <\/p>\n
G: What about control? <\/p>\n
B: Now all politicians assume a necessity of control, the more
\n efficient the control the better. All political organizations
\n tend to function like a machine, to eliminate the unpredictable
\n factor of AFFECT—emotion. Any machine tends to absorb,
\n eliminate, Affect. Yet the only person who can make a machine
\n move is someone who has a motive, who has Affect. If all
\n individuals were conditioned to machine efficiency in the
\n performance of their duties they would have to be at least one
\n person outside the machine to give the necessary orders; if the
\n machine absorbed or eliminated all those outside the machine the
\n machine will slow down and stop forever. Any unchecked impulse
\n does, within the human body & psyche, lead to the destruction
\n of the organism. <\/p>\n
G: What kind of organization could technological society have
\n without control? <\/p>\n
B: The whole point is I feel the machine should be eliminated. Now
\n that it has served its purpose of alerting us to the dangers of
\n machine control. Elimination of all natural sciences—-If
\n anybody ought to go to the extermination chambers definitely
\n scientists, yes I’m definitely antiscientist because I feel that
\n science represents a conspiracy to impose as, the real and only
\n universe, the Universe of scientists themselves—-they’re
\n reality-addicts, they’ve got to have things so real so they can
\n get their hands on it. We have a great elaborate machine which
\n I feel has to be completely dismantled— in order to do that
\n we need people who understand how the machine works —the mass
\n media—paralleled opportunity. <\/p>\n
G: Who do you think is responsible for the dope situation in
\n America? <\/p>\n
B: Old Army game, “I act under orders .” As Captain Ahab said,
\n “You are not other men but my arms and legs—” Mr. Anslinger
\n has a lot of arms and legs, or whoever is controlling him, same
\n thing as the Wichman case, he’s the front man, the man who has
\n got to take the rap, poor bastard, I got sympathy for him. <\/p>\n
C: Could you or do you think it wise to say who it will be or just
\n what force it will be that will destroy the world? <\/p>\n
B: You want to create a panic? That’s top secret—-want to swamp
\n the lifeboats? <\/p>\n
C: O.K. How did them there lifeboats get there in the first place?<\/p>\n
B: Take for instance some Indians in South America I seen. There
\n comes along this sloppy cop with his shirt buttons all in the
\n wrong hole, well then, Parkinson’s law goes into
\n operation—there’s need not for one cop but seven or eight,
\n need for sanitation inspectors, rent collectors, etc.; so after
\n a period of years problems arise, crime, dope taking and
\n traffic, juvenile delinquency—So the question is asked, “What
\n should we do about these problems?” The answer as Gertrude Stein
\n on her deathbed said comes before the question— in short
\n before the bastards got there in the first place! that’s all— <\/p>\n
G: What do you think Cuba and the FLN think about poets? And what
\n do you think their marijuana policy is? <\/p>\n
B: All political movements are basically anti-creative—-since a
\n political movement is a form of war. “There’s no place for
\n impractical dreamers around here” that’s what they always say.
\n “Your writing activities will be directed, kindly stop horsing
\n around.” “As for the smoking of marijuana, it is the
\n exploitation for the workers.” Both favor alcohol and are
\n against pot. <\/p>\n
C: I feel capitol punishment is dooming U.S.A. <\/p>\n
B: I’m against Capitol Punishment in all forms, and I have written
\n many pamphlets on this subject in the manner of Swift’s modest
\n proposal pamphlet incorporated into Naked Lunch; these pamphlets
\n have marked Naked Lunch as an obscene book, most all methods
\n of Capitol Punishment are designed to inflict the maximum of
\n humiliation—note attempts to prevent suicide. <\/p>\n
G: What advice do you have for American youth who are drawn to
\n political action out of sympathy for the American revolution— <\/p>\n
B: “I wouldn’t be in your position”—old saw. If there is any
\n political move that I would advocate it would be an alliance
\n between America and Red China, if they’d have us. <\/p>\n
C: What about the Arab peoples—how are they faring? <\/p>\n
B: They’re stuck back thousands of years and they think they’re
\n going to get out with a TV set. <\/p>\n
C: What about the Negros, will they make it—not only the ones in
\n the South, but everywhere? <\/p>\n
B: Biologically speaking the Afro-asiatic block is in the
\n ascendancy—always remember that both Negro and White are
\n minority groups—the largest race is the mongoloid group. In
\n the event of atomic war there is a tremendous biological
\n advantage in the so-called underdeveloped areas that have high
\n birth rates and high death rate because, man, they can plow
\n under those mutations. The country with a low birth rate and low
\n death rate will be hardest hit—and so the poor may indeed
\n inherit the earth, because they’re healthier. <\/p>\n
G: What do you think of White Supremacy? <\/p>\n
B: The essence of white supremacy is this: they are people who want
\n to keep things as they are. That their children’s children’s
\n children might be a different color is something very alarming
\n to them—in short they are committed to the maintenance of
\n static image. The attempt to maintain a static image, even if
\n it’s a good image, just won’t work. <\/p>\n
C: Do you think Americans want and could fight the next war with
\n the same fire and fervency as they did in World War 2? <\/p>\n
B: Undoubtedly, yes—because they remember what a soft time they
\n had in the last one—they sat on their ass. <\/p>\n
